Amrika, Pakistan, Islam and everything in between

Category: Islam (Page 1 of 2)

73 Years

I wrote this last year but never posted it.

today is the 73rd year of the independence of Pakistan. The country I left as 19 years old looking for a better future. I did find religion and a future but being away from Pakistan left a gaping hole in my personality. this will be something I need to come to terms with but alhamdulillah I was born in Pakistan and lived as a Pakistani and still love Pakistan.

what religion gave me was a sense of no nationalism. Islam doesn’t preach that. but I feel that we as Pakistanis overdo it. religion is something that needs to be lived, not just professed. we pay lip service to the religion but don’t act on it. this is true in current-day Pakistan or maybe many Muslim countries but I am talking about Pakistan. what has destroyed Pakistan in the last 50 years is the culture that was elevated above religion, the nonaccountability of religious authority, the use of religion by political forces. this created a disconnect between a normal man and the accountability that needs to exist at every level. What we still wait for in Pakistan is a better day. Inshallah it will come, not sure when. Allah helps those who help themselves.

we have institutionalized corruption, given it religious NRO. you can do corruption and you are fine. the Law is for the poor. It will keep on going for the poor. The rich are untouchable. The movie Elysium, it was something that portrayed the plight of the people while the rich lived out of reach and out of reality.

Maybe this is a rant and I am just venting but we tried. We tried when the time was right but the rich won the race. I remember when i was in Islamabad there was a Landrover showroom in Blue Area, I used to think about who buys cars from there. Never saw much Landrovers on the road. I did see a lot of Land cruisers which were a status symbol and the UN had a lot of them in Islamabad also. So I assumed it is in the garages of the rich people. Come to my last visit in 2015 and the roads were littered with high-end cars. The roads were never fixed but the Rich got Audis, Mercedes, Landcruisers and alot of Range Rovers.

Long Live the Halal earned money.

Ramadan is Coming

So Ramadan is nearly a week or so away, i am freaking out now, Last year also i think I couldnt give my 100% during Ramadan and now it is the same. I pray I am able to put my self in a position where i am able to do every normal Muslim can do Inshallah.
It is going to be a great month, spend time with my family, read Tafsir/Quran and Inshallah complete a book. Not sure where i will go for Taraweeh but Inshallah it will be fun 🙂
Ramadan is the month when Quran was sent down. it is the month during which Battle of Badr took place, it is the month when the night of Qadr comes, This night is equivalent to 1000 months. A night that cannot be missed and inshallah will not be missed.
I look forward to this month and I pray that i get this month and many more in future.

I read this hadith and get scared but then Duniya takes over me and then i read this again and get scared and then duniya takes over me ….. :(

Volume 2, Book 23, Number 468:
Narrated Samura bin Jundab:
Whenever the Prophet finished the (morning) prayer, he would face us and ask, “Who amongst you had a dream last night?” So if anyone had seen a dream he would narrate it. The Prophet would say: “Ma sha’a-llah” (An Arabic maxim meaning literally, ‘What Allah wished,’ and it indicates a good omen.) One day, he asked us whether anyone of us had seen a dream. We replied in the negative. The Prophet said, “But I had seen (a dream) last night that two men came to me, caught hold of my hands, and took me to the Sacred Land (Jerusalem). There, I saw a person sitting and another standing with an iron hook in his hand pushing it inside the mouth of the former till it reached the jaw-bone, and then tore off one side of his cheek, and then did the same with the other side; in the mean-time the first side of his cheek became normal again and then he repeated the same operation again. I said, ‘What is this?’ They told me to proceed on and we went on till we came to a man Lying flat on his back, and another man standing at his head carrying a stone or a piece of rock, and crushing the head of the Lying man, with that stone. Whenever he struck him, the stone rolled away.
The man went to pick it up and by the time he returned to him, the crushed head had returned to its normal state and the man came back and struck him again (and so on). I said, ‘Who is this?’ They told me to proceed on; so we proceeded on and passed by a hole like an oven; with a narrow top and wide bottom, and the fire was kindling underneath that hole. Whenever the fire-flame went up, the people were lifted up to such an extent that they about to get out of it, and whenever the fire got quieter, the people went down into it, and there were naked men and women in it. I said, ‘Who is this?’ They told me to proceed on. So we proceeded on till we reached a river of blood and a man was in it, and another man was standing at its bank with stones in front of him, facing the man standing in the river. Whenever the man in the river wanted to come out, the other one threw a stone in his mouth and caused him to retreat to his original position; and so whenever he wanted to come out the other would throw a stone in his mouth, and he would retreat to his original position. I asked, ‘What is this?’ They told me to proceed on and we did so till we reached a well-flourished green garden having a huge tree and near its root was sitting an old man with some children. (I saw) Another man near the tree with fire in front of him and he was kindling it up. Then they (i.e. my two companions) made me climb up the tree and made me enter a house, better than which I have ever seen. In it were some old men and young men, women and children.
Then they took me out of this house and made me climb up the tree and made me enter another house that was better and superior (to the first) containing old and young people. I said to them (i.e. my two companions), ‘You have made me ramble all the night. Tell me all about that I have seen.’ They said, ‘Yes. As for the one whose cheek you saw being torn away, he was a liar and he used to tell lies, and the people would report those lies on his authority till they spread all over the world. So, he will be punished like that till the Day of Resurrection.
The one whose head you saw being crushed is the one whom Allah had given the knowledge of Quran (i.e. knowing it by heart) but he used to sleep at night (i.e. he did not recite it then) and did not use to act upon it (i.e. upon its orders etc.) by day; and so this punishment will go on till the Day of Resurrection. And those you saw in the hole (like oven) were adulterers (those men and women who commit illegal sexual intercourse). And those you saw in the river of blood were those dealing in Riba (usury). And the old man who was sitting at the base of the tree was Abraham and the little children around him were the offspring of the people. And the one who was kindling the fire was Malik, the gate-keeper of the Hell-fire. And the first house in which you have gone was the house of the common believers, and the second house was of the martyrs. I am Gabriel and this is Michael. Raise your head.’ I raised my head and saw a thing like a cloud over me. They said, ‘That is your place.’ I said, ‘Let me enter my place.’ They said, ‘You still have some life which you have not yet completed, and when you complete (that remaining portion of your life) you will then enter your place.’ ”
If one doesnt realize his/her mistakes after reading this then that person is truly lost 🙁

The same is in urdu at these two pages
http://qurango.com/images/h2/262.jpg
http://qurango.com/images/h2/263.jpg
http://qurango.com/images/h2/264.jpg
http://qurango.com/images/h2/265.jpg

Friday Prayers

Every Friday I goto Friday prayer alhamdulillah, but I have been seeing something that I feel is so important and we don’t talk about it. We all already know that Friday is the most important day of the week, there are numerous hadith about this and some are below.

It was narrated that Abu Hurayrah and Hudhayfah (may Allaah be pleased with them) said: The Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Allaah led those who came before us away from Friday. The Jews had Saturday, and the Christians had Sunday. Then Allaah brought us and Allaah guided us to Friday. So there is Friday, Saturday and Sunday, and thus they will follow us on the Day of Resurrection. We are the last of the people of this world but we will be the first on the Day of Resurrection, and we will be dealt with before all others.” (Muslim)

It was narrated from Aws ibn Aws that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “The best of your days is Friday. On that day Adam (peace be upon him) was created; on that day he died; on that day the Trumpet will be blown and on that day all of creation will swoon. So send a great deal of blessings upon me, for your blessings will be shown to me.” They said, “O Messenger of Allaah, how will our blessings upon you be shown to you when you have turned to dust?” He said, “Allaah has forbidden the earth to consume the bodies of the Prophets, peace be upon them.”  (Abu Dawood; Classed as saheeh by Ibn al-Qayyim in his comments on Sunan Abi Dawood, 4/273; and classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 925.)

It was narrated that Abu Lubaabah ibn ‘Abd al-Mundhir said: The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “Friday is the master of days, and the greatest of them before Allaah. It is greater before Allaah than the day of al-Adha and the day of al-Fitr. It has five characteristics: on this day Allaah created Adam, on it He sent Adam down to the earth, on it Allaah caused Adam to die, on it there is a time when a person does not ask Allaah for anything but He gives it to him, so long as he does not ask for anything haraam, and on it the Hour will begin. There is no angel who is close to Allaah, no heaven, no earth, no wind, no mountain and no sea that does not fear Friday.”  (Narrated by Ibn Maajah; 1084; Classed as hasan by Shaykh al-Albaani in Saheeh al-Jaami’, no.  2279)

Some years ago, when I had started working at a university, I was asked by my manager to go troubleshoot a desktop computer in the university president’s office. I went along with my manager and once we entered the office, for some reason we were on our best behavior, Not to make any slight mistake or say something improper. This somehow kicked in and it was due to the fact that the office was of the president and the president was the President of the university. He was the top of the top in the management, him having issue with his computer was a problem for everyone in IT. This could have been similar to anyone where the person could be the president of a company I might have worked for or the director of my division. I realized that when I went to see someone higher up or some customer (who for some reason controlled the company’s main contract) or a customer visiting the office or going for an interview, we are  expected to dress up and be on our best behavior, be presentable (which could mean that you have you have the proper attire, suit with tie, , hair nicely done, no foul breath, mouth wash used, mustache trimmed and beard nicely kept and even your nails are dealt accordingly, so you don’t seem like a person out of a jungle).

There is a hadith about cleanliness being half of the Iman (faith).

Narrated Abû Mâlik Al-Hârith bin Âsim Al-Ash’ari: Allah’s Messenger said, “Cleanliness is half of Faith; the utterance of Allah (Al-hamdu lillah – all praise belongs to Allah) fills the scales of good actions; the utterance of Allah (Glory be to Allah and all praise belongs to Allah) fills the space between the heavens and the earth, and Salât (prayer) is light; and charity is the proof of Faith; and endurance is a light, and the Qur’ân is a plea in your favour or against you. Every person begins the morning ready to strike a deal with his soul as a stake; he either ransoms it or puts it into perdition.” (Muslim)

Now what does this got to do with Friday prayer. Well it has to do something with Salat in general. When we pray, we are infront of Allah. Who is Allah, he is the lord of the worlds, the creator of everything, the owner of our souls and owner of everything between heavens and earth. He is all in all of everything, much more than a president of a university, director of a company, CEO of multi billion dollar company, bigger and important than anything and everything.

So when we go infront of the almight to pray, to beg and to ask for forgiveness, we are usually dressed up like bums. We are not at our best behavior or even presentable, we are wearing dirty clothes, pajamas, sagging pants, long shorts that are not long enough, smelling bad or of smoking, sometimes i have seen people just come out of bed and show up at the moque, sometimes jeans, Tshirt combination, gym clothes or just anything casual that you wouldn’t wear to work at all. Well I can understand people do this at home but for Friday it is a different story. I usually see people on Friday enjoying Casual Fridays at work, I can understand wearing business clothes all week might seem like a burden and casual Friday is an escape from those superficial clothing.

Lets see what we are actually doing, we are dressing up every day for this duniya, to make up points at work, impress the bosses, abide by the dress policy or just because you see customers or are expected to wear those clothes. On Friday we take a step back cuz the expected fact is that Friday is the casual day but while trying to enjoy the life in duniya we end up forgetting that Friday is the best day of the week, like Eid everyweek for us. If we put a little bit effort and think of the day when it is the best day of the week, you are going to be in presence of other Muslims, be closest to Allah during sajda, then you should dress up accordingly. Don’t show up at the mosque like it is a basket ball match or your going for a BBQ.

“O you who believe (Muslims)! When the call is proclaimed for the Salaah (prayer) on Friday (Jumu‘ah prayer), come to the remembrance of Allaah [Jumu‘ah religious talk (Khutbah) and Salaah (prayer)] and leave off business (and every other thing). That is better for you if you did but know!” (Al-Jumu’ah 62:9)

Tomorrow if you are told that you are going to meet the president of the country, I doubt anyone would show up in jeans or jogging bottoms and a Tshirt. Why do we then think differently for Allah, when Allah is much more important for us than anyone else. Just remember that we need him and he doesn’t need us.

It is only Shaitan (Satan) that suggests to you the fear of his Auliya’ [supporters and friends (polytheists, disbelievers in the Oneness of Allah and in His Messenger, Muhammad pbuh)]; so fear them not, but fear Me, if you are (true) believers. (Surah 3/Ayah 175)

There is a hadith also but cant find it in Tirmidhi for now

Ibn Hibban narrated “Whoever will seek to please Allah by displeasing men, Allah (The Glorified and The Exalted) will make him independent of the help and favour of men and He Himself will become sufficient unto him, and whoever will seek to please men by displeasing Allah, Allah (The Glorified and The Exalted) will give him in the charge of men. And peace (be with you)!” (Tirmidhi)

Bahrain (a thought)

 

This is a very confused rant which I put down in writing, I just didn’t know how to gather all facts and write them. So just read it.

Initially I had been very much appalled by the news of the crackdown on the Bahraini Demonstrators; I thought, here was another regime that was trying to put down dissent. I was actively posting stories about how bad it was on my face book profile until I decided to take a step back and look at the whole geo political situation. Talked to some of my father’s friends who were working in intelligence in Bahrain and came to the conclusion that this had to happen, otherwise there would be a bigger issue of stability and security in the region.

No one can deny that Iran has some sort of hand in this whole mess up. I was even told and later in the news the same thing came up that there were individuals who were trained by Hezbollah, this is an alarming fact and cannot be taken lightly. Having Bahrain fall in the hands of the Shia run Iranian regime would cause more than just concern. Coming back to Bahrain, there were solid progress being made in the last couple of years about addressing the concerns of the citizens who felt that they have been left out of the economic progress of the country, The crown prince is very forward looking and would have worked to ensure more rights and reform, but the protest put an end to any future hope of such actions. Further killing of policemen and then targeted attacks on South Asians just because some of their countrymen work for the police or are part of the Security establishment further proved that the people behind these were not looking for resolution to their concerns about jobs and housing but were trying to  further destabilize the region so there could be a need for Iran to get involved.

It seems that the demonstrators initially might have had some legit concerns but after a few days, it was just a mob of people who wanted to cause clear harm to Bahrain’s reputation, security and stability. Whatever the outcome will be  in the coming days and any outcry that will result due to the government’s actions will be the doing of the demonstrators. The death sentences handed out today are a clear indication that the government takes very seriously when law and order is challenged and I don’t blame them.

I remember from my time in Bahrain (back in the 90s) that there was another set of demonstrations and riots and they were put down by the government, I had realized how biased the demonstrators were, when we as high school kids were cautioned and scared of going into certain areas as Pakistanis were constantly attacked for being Pakistani (majority of the police is Pakistani). It didn’t come as a surprise what happened this time also.

Whatever the case now, Bahrain is now in a very delicate time period. The people will get some benefit out of this but maybe the steps taken towards reform might be rolled back and will take another decade to be at the point where they were before all this happened. It is now to just wait and see what happens, after all the terrorist elements are cleared up, I am sure the government will take positive steps towards reform but until then don’t expect the government to give in to demands posed by the Iranian establishment through their proxies in Bahrain.

 

 

محققِ قرآن اور احیائے خلافت کے حامی

محققِ قرآن اور احیائے خلافت کے حامی

علی سلمان
بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام، لاہور
پاکستان میں تنظیمِ اسلامی کے بانی اور مذہبی سکالر ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد کی زندگی میں ایسے کئی موڑ آئے جب انہیں اپنے قول وفعل، بیان و عمل کی وجہ سے اختلاف اور تنقید کا سامنا کرنا پڑا البتہ گذشتہ دو دہائیوں سے انہوں نے کوئی ایسا بیان نہیں دیا تھا جسے عوامی سطح پر متنازعہ قرار دیا جاسکے۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد قرآن مجید کے محقق تھے اور انہوں نے ڈاکٹری کا پیشہ چھوڑ کر قرآن پاک کی تشریح و توضیح اور اس کا پیغام پھیلانے کا کام فریضہ اپنایا اور آخری دم تک وہ اس میں مشغول رہے۔

سنہ اسی کی دہائی میں جب فوجی حکمران ضیاءالحق کی مجلس شوری میں شمولیت کے ساتھ ساتھ انہوں نے سرکاری ٹیلی ویژن یعنی پی ٹی وی پر ان کا درس قرآن کا پروگرام الہدی شروع کیا تو پاکستان میں ان کی شہرت عروج پر پہنچ گئی۔

صدر ضیاءالحق ماڈل ٹاؤن میں یا باغ جناح کی مسجد دارالسلام میں ان کی امامت میں نماز ادا کرتے اور خطبہ سنا کرتے تھے۔

انہی دنوں ڈاکٹر اسرار نے چند ایسے بیانات دیے جن پر انہیں عوامی حلقوں کے ردعمل کا سامنا کرنا پڑا۔ انہوں نے پاکستان کے مقبول ترین کھیل کرکٹ کے بارے میں جرمنی کے سابقہ نازی حکمران ہٹلر کے اس قول کی حمایت کی کہ ’یہ ایسا کھیل ہے جسے بے وقوف کھیلتے اور گدھے دیکھتے ہیں‘۔

جنرل ضیاء الحق نے باغ جناح میں ان کی امامت میں نماز ادا کرنے کے بعد ان سے مجلس شوری چھوڑنے کی وجہ پوچھی تو انہوں نے کہا تھا کہ آپ نے اسلام نافذ کرنے کا جھوٹا وعدہ کیا تھا اور لوگوں کو اسلام کے نام پر دھوکا دیا۔
اگرچہ ڈاکٹر اسرار کی تقاریر کا مرکز کبھی فرقہ واریت نہیں رہا لیکن وہ خود مسلمانوں کے اہلحدیث مسلک سے تعلق رکھتے تھے اور بقول مولانا حیدر موددی ’دیگر مسالک کے علماء کی طرح بعض اہلحدیث علماء بھی تقوی کے معاملے میں اعتدال سے تجاوز کرجاتے ہیں‘۔ انہوں نے پردے کے بارے میں مولانا کے خیالات کو متشددانہ قرار دیا اور کہا کہ ’وہ سمجھتے تھے کہ عورت کے ہاتھ پاؤں منہ سب پردے میں ڈھکے رہنے چاہیئیں‘۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد نے چند برس کے بعد ضیاءالحق کی مجلس شوری سے استعفی دے دیا تھا اور جنرل ضیاء الحق نے باغ جناح میں ان کی امامت میں نماز ادا کرنے کے بعد ان سے مجلس شوری چھوڑنے کی وجہ پوچھی تو انہوں نے کہا تھا کہ آپ نے اسلام نافذ کرنے کا جھوٹا وعدہ کیا تھا اور لوگوں کو اسلام کے نام پر دھوکا دیا۔

لاہور کے سینئر صحافی پرویز حمید نے کہا کہ فوجی آمر سے ہونے والی یہ گفتگو ان دنوں اخبارات میں شائع ہوگئی تھی جس کا اختتام ڈاکٹر اسرار کے اس جملے سے پر ہوا تھا کہ ’میں یہاں بیٹھا ہوں آپ جب اسلامی نظام نافذ کرلیں گے تو میں آپ کے ساتھ شامل ہوجاؤں گا‘۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد اس سے پہلے جماعت اسلامی کو بھی نقطۂ نظر کے اختلاف کی بنیاد پر خیر باد کہہ چکے تھے۔وہ جماعت اسلامی کے پارلیمانی طرز سیاست میں حصہ لینے اور اس کے بانی مولانا موددی کے یک شخصی فیصلوں کے خلاف تھے۔ ڈاکٹر اسرار کا خیال تھا کہ پارلیمانی طرز سیاست کچھ لو اور کچھ دو کی بنیاد پر فیصلے کرتی ہے جبکہ ان کے خیال میں خلافت کا احیاء ہی حقیقی مسلم طرز حکمرانی ہوسکتاہے۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد ایک عرصے تک اپنے خطابات میں یہ کہتے رہے کہ پاکستان کا دشمن بھارت نہیں ہے بلکہ امریکہ یورپ اور اسرائیل اصل مخالف ہیں جو تیسری دنیا کو پسماندہ رکھنے اور ان پر مظالم کے ذمہ دار ہیں۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد نے بھارت کے کئی دورے بھی کیے اور وہاں مسلمانوں کے بڑے اجتماعات سے خطاب کیا۔ اپنی وفات سے صرف تین مہینے پہلے بی بی سی لاہور آفس کے دفتر تشریف لائے تو غیر رسمی گفتگو کےدوران میں انہوں نے کہا کہ بھارت میں ایک ایسی مضبوط لابی موجود ہے جو پاکستان سے تعلقات ٹھیک نہیں ہونے دے گی۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد ایک عرصے تک اپنے خطابات میں یہ کہتے رہے کہ پاکستان کا دشمن بھارت نہیں ہے بلکہ امریکہ یورپ اور اسرائیل اصل مخالف ہیں جو تیسری دنیا کو پسماندہ رکھنے اور ان پر مظالم کے ذمہ دار ہیں۔
ڈاکٹر اسرار نے اس موقع پر بھارتی اسلامی مبلغ ڈاکٹر ذاکر نائیک کی تعریف کی اور کہا کہ وہ اسلام کے لیے بہت کام کررہے ہیں۔ان کا یہ بھی تجزیہ تھا کہ پاکستانیوں کی نسبت بھارتی مسلمان اسلام کے زیادہ قریب ہیں۔ ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد نے بتایا کہ ڈاکٹر ذاکر نائیک کے پیس ٹی وی کی طرح وہ بھی پاکستان میں ٹی وی چینل کھولنا چاہتے ہیں لیکن حکام طرح طرح کی شرائط عائد کررہے ہیں۔

اس ملاقات کے غیر رسمی ہونے کا فائدہ اٹھاتے ہوئے میں نے ان سے کہا کہ وہ کچھ کمپرومائز کرکے ایک دفعہ چینل کا لائسنس حاصل کیوں نہیں کرلیتے؟ اس بات پر وہ خاموش ہوگئے لیکن ان کا انداز بتا رہا تھا کہ زندگی میں کبھی کمپرومائز نہ کرنے والے ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد کو یہ بات پسند نہیں آئی تھی۔

ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد کی جگہ اب ان کے صاحبزادے حافظ عاکف سعید تنظیم اسلامی کے امیر ہیں اور بظاہر اب وہ اصلاح معاشرہ کی اس تحریک کو آگے بڑھائیں گے جو ان کے والد نے شروع کی تھی۔ یہ وہی عاکف سعید ہیں جن کی شادی اسلامی مہینے محرم کی نویں اور دسویں کوہوئی تھی۔

جماعت اسلامی کے بانی مولانا موددی کے صاحبزادے مولانا فاروق حیدر موددی نے ایک سوال کے جواب میں کہا کہ وہ اس شادی میں شریک نہیں ہوئے تھے کیونکہ دس محرم جیسے یوم سوگ پر شادی میں شرکت کا وہ سوچ بھی نہیں سکتے ۔انہوں نے کہا کہ جان بوجھ کر کسی کی دل آزاری کرنا کوئی مستحسن اقدام نہیں ہے۔

Why have the British media killed the ‘Kill Khalid’ reviews?

Despite rave reviews in the US, Paul McGeough’s book about a failed Mossad assassination attempt has been ignored by British media

By Phillip Knightley
LAST UPDATED 3:10 PM, JULY 21, 2009
In April this year Quartet Books published Kill Khalid: The Failed Assassination of Khalid Mishal and the Rise of Hamas. It was written by an Australian war correspondent, Paul McGeough, an expert on the Middle East.

The book had come out in the United States to ecstatic reviews. I had heard of McGeough and although I did not know him, when asked to provide a quote for the book’s dust-jacket, I read the manuscript and was happy to do so.

I found it a rare and most exciting book – a serious political history that the author had made into a fast-paced thriller. At its core is the story of how, in 1997, the Israeli intelligence service Mossad tried to assassinate the Hamas leader, Khalid Mishal, in broad daylight on the streets of Amman, Jordan. Under the cover of opening a can of Coca Cola, the assassins sprayed a deadly poison into his ear.

Israel handed over the antidote when Jordan threatened to hang their agentsBut the Mossad agents bungled their escape, Khalid’s bodyguards managed to capture two of them and the others had to hide in the Israeli embassy. As Khalid slipped into a coma, Jordanian troops surrounded the Israeli embassy and after a complaint from a furious King Hussein of Jordan, Bill Clinton pressured the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, to try to right matters.

At first Netanyahu pleaded that it was too late to reverse the effects of the poison. But when Hussein added the threat that if Khalid died, the Mossad agents who were being held by Jordan would all be hanged, the antidote was quickly produced. Khalid survived, just, and the stage was set for his phenomenal political ascendancy.

Containing interviews with all the leading players, including unprecedented access to Khalid himself, McGeough’s book recounts the history of Hamas through a decade of suicide bombing attacks, political infighting and increasing public support, culminating in the battle for Gaza in 2007 and the present day political stalemate.

This is a serious book with an important message about one of the world’s most

turbulent trouble spots. But it received a strange reception in Britain. After two excellent reviews – in the London Review of Books and the Times Literary Supplement – it has been virtually ignored.

The chairman of Quartet Books, Naim Attallah, was so concerned about this that he contacted the literary editors of all the major publications. Most told him that they did not plan to review the book. Further, his sales force informed him that some bookshops were reluctant even to stock it.

Attallah then issued a press release accusing the literary establishment of “an unspoken tactic to limit the book’s public circulation” because of a decision to “dismiss Hamas within the box of ‘terrorist organisation’ without granting a serious consideration to its valid aspects as a voice in the debate”.

He added: “Anyone who hopes for peace in the Middle East must surely recognise that Hamas is an integral part of any move towards a peace settlement. No progress can be achieved without their involvement.”

Khalid Mishal, ill after being poisoned by Mossad agents, is transferred to hospital

It is difficult to attribute motives to organisations for their non-action in any controversy. But it does seem to me that in this case the British literary establishment has a case to answer. I believe it has developed a mind-set that is adverse to controversy. Hamas has been designated a ‘terrorist organisation’. Therefore to review a book about a ‘terrorist organisation’ would leave a book editor open to criticism.

Further, it might provoke a complaint from one of the many organisations that supports Israel. This would require a response.
Memos would have to be exchanged and letters written.

At a time of reduced budgets and staff cuts, many a literary editor would be tempted to decide that to review a controversial book like Kill Khalid is simply not worth the trouble.

http://www.thefirstpost.co.uk/50995,news-comment,news-politics,british-media-kill-khalid-mishal-reviews-paul-mcgeough-mossad-israel-hamas-middle-east

KILL KHALID

I have nearly read this book and this book is a very interesting account on Hamas and its history. A must read for anyone who wants to know about Hamas.

The Martyr Who Did Not Die
By REVIEW BY GREG MYRE
Sunday, March 8, 2009

KILL KHALID

The Failed Mossad Assassination of Khalid Mishal and the Rise

of Hamas

By Paul McGeough

New Press. 477 pp. $26.95

Actuarial tables are not kind to the leaders of Hamas. The Israeli security forces reserve a special fury for the radical Islamic group, and it’s tough to be taken seriously as a Hamas leader unless you can prove that the Israelis tried to kill you at least once.

The group’s most notorious bomb maker was killed by an exploding cellphone in 1996. Its quadriplegic founder, Sheik Ahmed Yassin, was in his wheelchair on his way home from a mosque when an Israeli missile struck him down in 2004. This past New Year’s Day, a one-ton Israeli bomb flattened the apartment building that housed Hamas firebrand Nizar Rayyan, killing him, all four of his wives and 11 of their children.

Given this history, Khalid Mishal, a key figure in Hamas since the group was founded two decades ago, can consider himself very lucky indeed. His brush with death came on the streets of Amman, Jordan, in 1997, when an Israeli Mossad agent squirted an exotic poison in his ear. But the would-be assassin and an accomplice were quickly chased down by Mishal’s driver, his bodyguard and some passersby. Outraged that the attack took place on Jordanian soil, King Hussein demanded the antidote from Israel as part of the price for releasing the Mossad agents. Under U.S. pressure, the Israelis reluctantly complied.

This episode made Mishal an instant legend within Hamas. He became a martyr in a group that reveres them and did so without the inconvenience of dying. In “Kill Khalid,” Australian journalist Paul McGeough uses the botched assassination as the jumping-off point for a timely and thorough examination of Hamas, highlighting the ways in which Israel has intentionally and unintentionally aided its rise.

Mishal’s near-death experience has been well reported in previous books and articles, and this book runs the risk of being as stale as month-old hummus. But in the circular nature of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the same characters keep coming back around, and this 12-year-old drama couldn’t be more relevant today.

Binyamin Netanyahu was the Israeli prime minister who authorized the attempt on Mishal’s life. It proved to be a huge embarrassment, and though Hamas wasn’t part of the negotiations, the reckless Israeli action was one of a thousand cuts that drained the blood out of the peace process that had begun so hopefully with the 1993 Oslo accords.

So what’s new? Well, Netanyahu’s Likud party finished a close second in Israel’s February elections, and he has been trying to form a coalition government with himself as prime minister. If he succeeds, his most immediate security concern will be Hamas . . . led by Khalid Mishal.

Back in 1997, President Bill Clinton intervened to calm the Jordanians and contain the political damage from the attempted assassination. This past week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton toured the region and met with Netanyahu in hopes of restarting negotiations. The cast may be familiar, but one huge difference between then and now is that Hamas is much more powerful, which will greatly complicate any peace effort.

McGeough documents how, two decades ago, Israel encouraged the development of Hamas by allowing it to establish schools, health clinics and other social services. Israel’s thinking at the time was that Hamas could serve as a religious counterweight to Yasser Arafat’s secular Fatah movement and splinter Palestinian loyalties. But once it put down roots, Hamas quickly expanded its role, moving from peace-process spoiler in the 1990s, to suicide-bombing assembly line at the beginning of this decade, to rulers of the ravaged Gaza Strip for the past three years.

For such a key figure, Mishal is not well known, even to Palestinians. He was just 11 when his family fled the West Bank in the wake of the 1967 war, and he last set foot there in 1975. After bouncing around the Middle East, he now maintains a relatively low profile in Damascus, where he lives in a guarded compound reserved mostly for Syrian VIPs and foreign diplomats. Yet as much as anyone else in the region today, Mishal is linked to all the key players. He tends to surface at vital moments — such as Israel’s assault on Gaza in December and January — and McGeough makes excellent use of him to explain the cross-currents that make the Middle East so messy.

To begin with, Mishal must negotiate the friction between Hamas “insiders,” the leaders based in Gaza, and the group’s “outsiders,” exiles such as himself. He also figures prominently in the tensions that pit Hamas against Fatah. He is a full-throated advocate of suicide bombings who issued predictably hard-line statements during the recent fighting in Gaza. Yet on those occasions when Hamas turns to diplomacy, Mishal pops up in Egypt or Saudi Arabia to guide the Hamas delegation.

He depends on Syria for his security and has links in Lebanon to Hezbollah, a group Hamas has long studied and emulated. Mishal is also on good terms with Hamas’s most important patron, Iran, which supplies cash and trains Hamas militants. In short, it’s hard to figure out the Mideast jigsaw puzzle without understanding where he fits in.

As a reporter, I covered Hamas for years, and it was always tricky gauging Mishal’s influence. His exhortations to strike at Israel certainly resonated with the radical youths in Gaza, yet at times it seemed that his perch in exile left him out of day-to-day decision-making by Hamas leaders on the ground.

But Israel has systematically killed many of those leaders, and Mishal’s prominence has grown by process of elimination. McGeough makes a strong case that, even from afar, Mishal is deeply involved in daily events in Gaza. The author was with Mishal in his Damascus compound in September 2007, when Al-Jazeera was broadcasting scenes of Hamas security forces beating Fatah protesters in Gaza. An exasperated Mishal spoke by phone to the Hamas security chief in Gaza and told him to ease up.

Far too many earnest, lumbering books on the Middle East propose recycled versions of the path to peace. McGeough doesn’t offer a solution to the conflict. But he provides a highly instructive account of how Hamas emerged as a potent force and why its faithful honor Mishal as the “martyr who did not die.”

View all comments that have been posted about this article.
© 2009 The Washington Post Company

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/06/AR2009030602019_pf.html

Britain expels Israeli diplomat over Dubai passport row

The UK is to expel an Israeli diplomat over the use of 12 forged British passports linked to the murder of Hamas leader Mahmoud al-Mabhouh in Dubai.
Foreign Secretary David Miliband told the Commons there were “compelling reasons” to believe Israel was responsible for the passport “misuse”.
He said: “The government takes this matter extremely seriously. Such misuse of British passports is intolerable.”
Israel says there is no proof it was behind the killing in Dubai in January.
But Mr Milband said it was “highly likely” the Israeli secret service Mossad was involved and the fact that Israel was a close ally added “insult to injury”.
Strong message
“Given that this was a very sophisticated operation, in which high-quality forgeries were made, the government judges it is highly likely that the forgeries were made by a state intelligence service,” he said.
“We have concluded that there are compelling reasons to believe Israel was responsible for the misuse of the British passports.”
BBC Middle East editor Jeremy Bowen said the expulsion sent a “very clear message” of British disapproval.

There can’t be a greater violation of trust for one ally to abuse the passports of another ally
Sir Menzies Campbell

Expulsion ‘a strong signal’
“It is a very big step for a government like the British to expel one of the diplomats belonging to one of its important allies,” he said.
The British government has stopped short of accusing Israel of the murder, but Mr Miliband has previously demanded full co-operation with its investigation into how the passports were obtained.
The foreign secretary’s statement indications from Britain’s Serious Organised Crime Agency (Soca) that officers had found proof of the cloned passports.
Soca officers had travelled to Israel to speak to those whose passports were copied with new photographs inserted.
A spokesman for the Palestinian Hamas group said it welcomed the decision to expel the diplomat but wanted international efforts to track down the killers stepped up.
Former Liberal Democrat leader, Sir Menzies Campbell, said for a diplomat to be expelled, Israel must have had “some hand” in the matter, or had been unwilling to co-operate with Soca.

ANALYSIS

Tim Franks, BBC News, Jerusalem
There is a clear Israeli desire to talk this argument down from one where it could damage the wider relationship.
As for the more general Israeli view, that is mixed. Many believe that there is a measure of slightly unconvincing righteous indignation from the countries whose nationals had their passports cloned. Those Israelis argue that Mahmoud al-Mabhouh was as much an enemy of the West, as of Israel.
But there are a good number of Israelis who also believe this was a cack-handed operation, which blew the identities of 27 valuable agents, and caused an unnecessary diplomatic stink.
He told BBC Radio 4’s World at One programme: “It is very serious indeed… there can’t be a greater violation of trust for one ally to abuse the passports of another ally.”
Downing Street confirmed that the head of Britain’s diplomatic service, Peter Ricketts, met Israel’s ambassador to London, Ron Prosor, on Monday.
Last month Mr Miliband described the use of fake UK passports as an “outrage” and vowed that the inquiry would “get to the bottom” of the affair.
It is believed 12 fake British passports were used in the plot to murder Mr Mabhouh – the founder of Hamas’s military wing – in his hotel room in Dubai on 19 January.
The names and details on the UK passports used by eight of the 12 suspects belonged to British-Israeli citizens living in Israel. All of them have denied involvement.
Dubai police have used CCTV footage to identify 27 alleged members of the team that tracked and killed Mr Mabhouh.
Other members of the hit squad travelled on fake Irish, French and Australian travel documents, Dubai police said.
Dubai officials said they were “99% certain” that agents from Mossad were behind the killing but Israel has said there is no proof its agents were involved.
Following his death, Mr Mabhouh’s family said doctors who had examined him determined he had died after receiving a massive electric shock to the head. They also found evidence that he had been strangled.
Blood samples sent to a French laboratory confirmed he was killed by electric shock, after which the body was sent to Syria.
Thousands of people attended Mr Mabhouh’s funeral at the Yarmouk Palestinian refugee camp, on the outskirts of Damascus in January.
In 1988 Britain expelled Israeli diplomat Arie Regev over a spying row. He was described by UK sources as a Mossad agent.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/8582518.stm

« Older posts

© 2025 Desi Thoughts

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑